What is this God? I know where is God, mister
Joseph
God is atheist because he doesn’t believe in
himself
by Ennio
Montesi
:
«Where
was God at Auschwitz? Oh. Lord, why were you silent?» The man with
the red hood and flapping shirt is complaining, as if we were a mass of idiots
with lobotomized brains.
:
I know why God allowed millions of men, women and
children to be killed and slaughtered by the Church with the tribunal of
Inquisition. Persons disembowelled, butchered, burnt, tortured, drowned,
strangled, impaled, quartered, cut up. The Church of the past is the same of
the Church of today, the Catholic Church. Where was God, mister Joseph, when
the Church committed these inhuman holocausts such as the tragedy of Auschwitz?
Where was God – your God – when with the Christian crusades of the Church
enormous genocides have been committed, slaughtering and massacring everything
that was possible to slaughter and massacre? Put yourself also this question
Joseph and above all give us an answer. The Nazi underwent a process, the
Process of Norimberga, for the grievous crimes perpetrated against Mankind.
And they have been judged.
:
Why, Joseph, your Church has never undergone a
historical process for the massacres accomplished along the centuries? Why
Joseph? Let us understand. Why the Church has never been judged in a process
in a tribunal? You can give the answer at once, here we don’t need to ask God,
but the Church that has a seat in your house.
:
You ask yourself, Why God was silent for Auschwitz,
but you know that no God will answer. You must answer: why the Church has
never undergone a historical process ? You can answer of that, you aren’t God
and will never be, you are exactly like all men and you have a mouth to speak
up. Do, tell people, say that at the angelus, say that at the cerimonies in
which you boast, say it on TV, say that on your newspapers, on the radio, you
have plenty of media to answer to this question. Hurry up. It is easy to point
at other people for their mistakes and ask somebody who doesn’t exist the
reason of things and events. Point your finger also at your Church that is
guilty, sure, and as you can answer, answer! If you won’t, Joseph, it means
that the question you put at Auschwitz is only rhetoric, hypocrisy and
demagogy you used to relaunch your doctrine, to capture a bunch of proselytes.
A lot of things could be said about the relationship between The Nazism and
the Church, too many. I only say that if I were a Jew or if I had a relative
who died in the holocaust, I would feel deeply offended for your question.
:
So, what do you say, Joseph, about this God? You
should know lots of things about, every day you talk of him as if he was a
great friend of yours you meet regularly, but you aren’t the only one to know
about him.
:
I know where God is and where he lives.
Io know why he is impotent and vile confronted with everything.
I know why he doesn’t go to the mess.
I know which is the mystery of this poor and miserable God.
I know why God keeps silent and doesn’t care of the great tragedies of Mankind.
I know why he doesn’t intervene in men’s affairs.
I know why God let men die in thousands, in a millions among terrible
sufferings.
I know why God let children be born with cancer and die soon after.
I know what id God’s design.
I know that God doesn’t know anything about the dogmas men invented.
I know why God doesn’t make miracles and has created anything and wouldn’t be
able to create anything.
I know why God isn’t able to write even if he has been taught for ages and
after they gave up.
I know why God let his Church use his name out for money and power.
I know why God is never angry and doesn’t understand why he should be.
I know why he doesn’t step in to say how things are.
I know why God allows a social class dominate on another in his name.
I know why God has never been seen even if he has nothing to do, no friends,
no acquaintance, always all alone.
I know why God knows nothing about theology, the science of the nothing.
I know why God doesn’t change his name, it is only the heads of human madness
that change.
I know why God indulges the sillinesses men say , men who wear a skirt and
foxes with cassock.
I know why God is against chastity and considers it a depraved thing against
nature.
I know why God avoids and escapes priests, bishops, cardinals and popes.
I know why God wishes everybody makes sex with happiness and pleasure .
I know why God has nothing to say against gays, lesbians and transsexuals and
them to live their life.
I know why God doesn’t forgive as there is nothing to forgive.
I know that God knows sin is an invention of the Church, as sin doesn’t exist.
I know why God ‘s name is inside the word hate.
I know why “lamb of God” can be said but not for other animals.
I know why God is racist, no he isn’t.
I know why God denies religions, those who spread and practice them.
I know what God thinks and wants in any moment.
I know what God will do tomorrow and what did yesterday.
I know that God is sick and wishes to be cured with embryo staminal cells, but
he can’t and must die like the others or he goes abroad.
I know that God appreciate the condom.
Io know that God would use the abortion pill RU486.
I know that God is a gay in pair week days and lesbian in odd ones and
heterosexual on Saturdays and he loves everybody in the same way and he allows
to be loved with passion.
I know why God isn’t a cannibal and doesn’t eat human flesh.
I know that God hates the confession because he doesn’t intrude in others’
affairs.
I know why God i san atheist, because he doesn’t believe in himself.
:
Everyone knows such things. There is nothing that
men with skirts know better than normal men. What priests say about God can be
said by anyone, the barman, the filling station attendant, the engineer, the
clerk. The chats without a base about God have the same value of my, your,
everybody’s chats. “God loves us” says the priest. “God gets on our tits” we
can say. We can’t give the lie to the priest about what - according to him –
God thinks. The same is for what – according to us – God is thinking. Priests
are very skilful in sophism, even more, they live their life and intrude in
others’ life with arrogance, working with cue reasoning to inexpert people.
Concepts expressed in a sophist way are difficult to identify but, once you
have understood the sophism, you can dismantle that soon.
:
“God doesn’t exist” has the same value and ground of
“God exists”. Both sentences can’t be said true or false. Even if saying “God
exists” has much more rationality and energy than the other hypothesis. It is
necessary to analyze Epicure’s concept that demonstrates the non-existence of
God. It remained irrefutable although the believers have been trying hard for
ages to dismantle it. Here it is, perfect and tough:
:
“Evil exists, so between two things one: or God knows or he ignores.
1) God knows that evil exists, he can erase it but he doesn’t want to... such
a God would be cruel and perverse, therefore we couldn’t admit that.
2) God knows that evil exists, he wants to erase it but he can’t do that...
such a God would be impotent, therefore we couldn’t admit that.
3) God doesn’t know that evil exists... such a God would be blind and ignorant,
therefore we couldn’t admit that.
:
The needle of reason is addressed toward the fact that “God doesn’t
exist”. Debating about God, even if it is a pleasant argument from the
intellectual point of view, we won’t reach any point. We may sing, play and
dance but we won’t reach any conclusion.
:
I will ask you, Joseph, another question very
important: I take the opportunity before you escape. A question that concerns
God. The question is about Christ as a man.
:
Joseph, could you answer this important thing I am
asking you, so we will have peaceful sleeps, both we as atheist and the
believers, most than all the believers. Sure you know Joseph about the case of
Cascioli, the scholar… yes, you remember him, ask your secretary… Cascioli
studied also in a priest seminary… here you remember. Well. I was saying that
Cascioli has written, after years of researches and deep studies, a very
important document, the book of denounce “The
fable of Christ – Irrefutable demonstration that Jesus never existed”.
Yes, sure, that book which demonstrates that Jesus, called Christ, never
existed. Yes, Christ in the flesh the way you are Joseph. Well. That Christ
that your Church boosts, well Cascioli states and demonstrates that he has
never existed, but he has been invented like the fable of Pinocchio. Now,
Joseph, Cascioli could be wrong or right. But you Joseph, the Church would you
give us please a proof concrete, historical, irrefutable and acceptable that
Christ has existed? That wouldn’t be difficult. It is a long time, 2.000 years,
you men with a skirt talk about this Christ, “Christ said”, “Christ did”
Christ here and there, somewhere you will have a proof. But it is curious the
fact that you have never showed it to Mankind… No, Joseph, let out the Gospel,
the scriptures and the holy shroud and other false things, you know better
than me that the Gospel can’t demonstrate that Christ existed. Let’s be
serious, don’t make the mistake to consider us idiot. Collodi wrote Pinocchio,
but that doesn’t prove that a puppet that became a man existed. Joseph, come
on, consult your Jesuits, your Dominicans… Yes, we want a proof that Christ
existed. Nothing more. You should know that this Cascioli…or better you should
read his book… ah, you have already read it… what do you think about that? Did
you like it, didn’t you? There are hundreds and hundreds proofs that Christ
never existed! That’s why we are asking you, Joseph, to take out a proof of a
historical Christ. But remember that the proof must be historical and
concrete, so forget the chats of faith and of catechism.
:
Appeal to all believers in Christ.
:
I invite all the believers to satisfy a whim asking
one’s parish priest the following question , exactly like this:
:
“Dear parish priest, show me please a concrete proof that Christ existed
historically. Only a proof, but concrete and historical”.
:
If the parish priest starts opening the Gospel, say
very calmly that the Gospel doesn’t demonstrate anything and that he can close
it. Say that you don’t want theological explanations, but concrete proofs. If
the priest takes time or starts with smoky arguments, if he says that on the
spot, he can’t remember , that there are lots of proofs. Ask for one, “just
one”, but concrete. Get him on the ropes and ask for the proof! If the priest
starts with the rigmarole of the faith, tell him that the faith doesn’t prove
anything. As for the existence of Garibaldi or of Napoleon, we don’t need the
faith: they existed and we have irrefutable proofs. If the parish priests,
dear believers, don’t give you a proof upon the existence of Christ, that
means they have cheated you. They have pushed you to believe in a person who
never existed, in a fable, to which many people have devoted, quite often, a
great deal of their life and much more.
:
We are waiting, Joseph, for the proof of the
existence of Christ to be shown to mankind. In that occasion we will ask for
an international Commission of experts. Believers and atheists are waiting.
:
Ennio Montesi
:
In the picture, the writer Ennio Montesi, author of
“ L’uomo a metà” - “Half
Man" (Il Ventaglio Ed. 1986 sold out), “Meloe”
(Alfredo Guida Editore, 1995).
http://www.unilibro.it/find_buy/product.asp?sku=30268&idaff=jhxzajqrugcd
Author of subjects for cinema and television. “Racconti per non impazzire” (“
Tales not to become mad”) have been written upon request by Federico Fellini.
He has been exchanging letters with the American writer Henry Roth. Roth who
wrote and dedicated to Montesi the short story "Prose-writer’s Threnody". The
epistolary, considered by the best international critics as a relevant
literary event, has been reviewed and debated on European and American
newspapers and reviews.
American Jewish Historical Society, New York:
This text is a Copyleft: the publishing and the reproduction are free and
encouraged
but the article must be reproduced integrally, with the same title,
And quoting the name of the author together with these words.
: